Legal Opinion

Sherwood Realty Corp. v. Feriola

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlannery, J.

The supplemental return complies neither with the earlier decision in this proceeding (Matter of Sherwood Realty Corp. v. Feriola, 193 Misc. 194), nor with section 1291 of the Civil Practice Act, nor with section 82 of the General City Law but would be deemed sufficient if a certificate of the clerk or secretary of the board were attached to the minutes reciting that he is the person or officer charged by law with the custody of the minutes and that the foregoing are a true and correct extract or excerpt therefrom.

• The copy of the minutes submitted shows a vote on a simple seconded motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hudson-Harlem Valley Title & Mortgage Co. v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Hopkins v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pierce v. MannionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Sherwood Realty Corp. v. FeriolaNew York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. CombsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  2. Lapham v. RoulanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ellison v. Board of Appeals of the City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API