Legal Opinion
Williams v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided April 24, 2001No. 3:99-0322PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the plaintiffs appeal of the plan administrator’s denial of short-term disability benefits under a disability plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The defendant has filed a memorandum in support of the administrator’s decision (Docket No. 12), the plaintiff has filed a memorandum in support of reversing the administrator’s decision (Docket No. 22), and the defendant has filed a reply. (Docket No. 23) For the reasons discussed herein, the court will enter JUDGMENT in favor…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
- Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Cornish v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009