Legal Opinion

Barron Co. v. Fox & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1924No. Appeal, 84PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The defendant ordered from the plaintiff a carload of “Choice Mississippi wrapped tomatoes.” The car containing ten hundred and seventy-one crates, at $1.10 per crate, f. o. b., arrived at Pittsburgh, June 13, 1921. After the merchandise was examined, the defendant telegraphed the same day to the plaintiff: “Car tomatoes 54579 arrived; very disappointed with quality and condition. Advise immediate disposition or protection in order to protect your papers.” On the same day the plaintiff replied to the telegram as follows: “54579 sold you f. o. b. Crystal Springs, choice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Danish Pride Milk Products Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bernstein v. HirschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Dimmick v. Banning, Cooper & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Christman v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lucacher v. KersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Melnick v. National Air LinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Hayden v. CoddingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Hutchinson v. Culbertson Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Zerodec Mega Corp. v. Terstep of Texas, Inc. (In Re Zerodec Mega Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API