Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Garry

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 16, 1996No. 1:95-cv-05394PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

BARTELS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Arthur T. Davidson, M.D., Esq., brings this action pro se pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983. Defendant Judge William Garry moves to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Background

Davidson claims that Judge Garry, while presiding over a state court case brought by Davidson, referred to Davidson, “who is a [bjlack [a]ttorney[,] in vicious derogatory terms in regards to his race and color,” refused to…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. OgdenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Aquino v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  3. Brannon v. TarlovDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  4. Huszar v. ZelenyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. Kashelkar v. MacCartneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API