Legal Opinion

Reitmeister v. Reitmeister

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 17, 1944No. 3833PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

A number of applications are combined in the same papers and they will be considered separately.

In two companion motions plaintiff seeks an order directing the six named defendants to appear and to submit to an examination before trial concerning enumerated matters. The motions are allegedly made pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, but examination of that rule reveals that there is no provision for the procedure here adopted. Issue has been joined in this action by the filing of an answer and Rule 26…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. United States ex rel. Edelstein v. Brussell Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Brach v. Macfadden Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marzo v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  2. Vasquez v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API