Legal Opinion

Brown v. Liniavski

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that, in his judgment as Price Administrator, the defendants are guilty of having violated Maximum Export Price Regulation, Revised Maximum Export Price Regulation, 2nd Revised Maximum Export Price Regulation, and Revised Price Schedule No. 49, hereinafter called the “Regulations.”

The violations of the Regulations constitute violations of Section 4 (a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 904 (a), hereinafter called the “Act”, and this action is brought to enforce compliance with the above section, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rottenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. HarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  3. United States v. C. Thomas Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
  4. United States v. CharneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  5. United States v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API