Simmons v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Plaintiff in error was convicted of unlawfully keeping intoxicating liquor for sale or gift. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of Adams County, Hon. S. W. Johnson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of a violation of the law relating to intoxicating liquors. He brings the cause here for review, and the same is now considered on his application for a' supersedeas.
The defendant was tried upon an information containing two counts, the first charging a sale of intoxicating liquors, and the second alleging that he “did wilfully, knowingly and unlawfully keep for the purpose of sale or gift, intoxicating liquors to-wit, whiskey.” A motion to quash the information was filed, and overruled. It is contended that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- People v. BarkdollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- People v. BraistedColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaggartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
- Ford v. City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Gonzales v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. Wong Hip ChungMontana Supreme Court · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.