Legal Opinion

State v. Wong Hip Chung

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1925No. 5,790PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

Wong Hip Chung, being on trial for feloniously possessing narcotics, was acquitted by direction of the court. Judgment of dismissal followed from which the state has appealed.

The defendant’s motion upon which the court directed his acquittal was based upon three grounds: (1) The information does not state a public offense; (2) the officers entrapped the defendant into committing the crime; and (3) the defendant was not in such possession of the narcotics as the law characterizes as criminal. The trial court seems to have deemed the information sufficient, and in this we think it was correct.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Newman v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  2. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  4. Commonwealth v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Fiunkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KarathanosMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. State v. FratesMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ParrMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. NeelyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API