Legal Opinion

Voris v. Eikel

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1952No. 13953_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.-

Brought by the Southern Stevedoring & Contracting Company, a partnership composed of Charles Eikel and B. D. Harris, employing stevedores, and their insurance carrier, the suit was to enjoin enforcement of an award of compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act, Title 33 U.S.C.A. § 901, et seq., entered by the defendant Deputy Commissioner on November 29, 1950, and supplemented and amended by an order of the Deputy Commissioner on March 14, 1951.

The claim was that the award was invalid because the provisions of Sec. 121 of the Longshoremen’s Act, 33…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Christensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Eikel v. VorisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Alessandro P. Nardella v. Campbell MacHine Inc. And Zenith National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Albert Seidner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. P. J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API