Legal Opinion

Albert Seidner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 17, 1958No. 14133_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the District Court’s denial, without hearing, of two motions, one for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, the other to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Neither motion alleged any ground upon which relief could be granted. Upon receiving a letter from appellant which indicated he was incarcerated in a mental institution run by the Bureau of Prisons and after examining the records, this court appointed a member of the bar as amicus curiae to file a memorandum. This memorandum raised for the first time a question as to whether appellant had been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Stephen S. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Kenneth H. Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Albert Lloyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Robert Lee Wells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lawrence W. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Norman E. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. Tinsley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hiller Arthur Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Herman Edward Nelms v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API