Legal Opinion

Gelfan v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1932No. Docket No. 7378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, who was a painting contractor, instituted this action against defendant Bessolo and Gualano, Inc., a corporation, which was the general contractor engaged in the erection of three separate apartment houses, for an alleged balance claimed by him as due under the terms of three agreements had with said defendant for the painting of said apartment houses, and as against defendant Angelo Bessolo under the terms of an alleged agreement of guaranty whereby said defendant guaranteed to plaintiff payment of the balances due him from Bessolo and Gualano, Inc., under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Barber v. BurrowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Rischard v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Joseph Musto Sons-Keenan Co. v. Pacific States Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arrow Flying Service, Inc. v. Universal Flyers Ground SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Hickey Pipe and Supply Co. v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API