Henderson v. Lott
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
A-motion is made to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this case, on the ground that Y. C. Lott, as administrator of Lucinda Lott, has not been made a party defendant to the bill of exceptions, and has not been served with a copy thereof or acknowledged service thereon. Lott was a party plaintiff in the ease in the court below, in his individual and’ representative capacity. He was represented in both capacities by the same attorneys. These attorneys in due time acknowledged due and legal service of the bill of exceptions, waived “all other and further service,” and signed the acknowledgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. FottchéSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Steele v. GravesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Jordy v. DunlevieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Donald v. GrovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Head v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Caito v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Schmid v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Lassiter v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.