Donald v. Groves
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. Where any’ suit is instituted or defended by a person insane at the time of trial, or by an indorsee, assignee, transferee, or by the personal representative of a deceased person, the opposite party shall not be admitted to testify in his own favor against the insane or deceased person, as to transactions or communications with such insane or deceased person. Civil Code (1910), § 5S58, par. 1.
(а) In Hendrick v. Daniel, 119 Ga. 358 (46 S. E. 438), and in Hendricks v. Allen, 128 Ga. 181 (57 S. E. 224), this court held that the grantee in a deed from a deceased person was, within the meaning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hendrick v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Boynton v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Kramer v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Hendricks v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Stewart v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Henderson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Freeman v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Thomas v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Lifsey v. MimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.