Schmid v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Presiding Justice.
The appeal in this case is from a judgment disbarring the appellant from the practice of law in this State. In his motion to dismiss he attacks the constitutionality of Code § 9-501 (1), which authorizes disbarment upon conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude and makes evidence of suck conviction conclusive, thus depriving him of the right to defend himself. While he enumerates the denial of this motion as error, the constitutional question made therein was not argued orally or by brief. Under numerous decisions of this court, the ground will be considered as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abrams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- James v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Head v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Henderson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Kingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Caito v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.