Legal Opinion

O'BARR v. Feist

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 1974No. SC 335PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*443McCALL, Justice.

Billy H. O’Barr, the appellant, sued the appellee, a physician, for damages arising out of his alleged wrongful commitment to Bryce Hospital at Tuscaloosa, a state mental hospital. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge gave written instructions as to all counts in the complaint, directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant physician. The appellee pleaded in short by consent the general issue.

Count B of the amended complaint claims in libel against the appellee for falsely and maliciously publishing of and concerning the appellant a written document filed in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Kenney v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Carl Turner Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BaxleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
  2. Butler v. Town of ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. McGranahan v. DaharSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API