Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Mangan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

Plaintiff, a State banking corporation now insolvent and in liquidation, has recovered a judgment against defendant upon two demand notes of which defendant is maker. Defendant appeals upon the ground that a recovery is barred because of the Statute of Limitations. He was an acquaintance and friend of one Andrew J. Horvatt, the payee named in the notes, and a member of a law firm of which Horvatt was a client. In connection with the first note of $6,500, dated December 29, 1923, plaintiff stresses the following circumstances as showing defendant’s intention that it was to be and remain a part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Shoemaker v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peoples Trust Co. v. O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Manufactures & Traders Trust Co. v. LindauerNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Scott v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Capitol Finance Corp. v. Fisher, New York County Courts1958
  5. Claim of Cook v. Buffalo General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API