Claim of Cook v. Buffalo General Hospital
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Van Voorhis, J
(dissenting). The decision of this appeal depends upon the application of the two-year Statute of Linn tations imposed by section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant contracted an occupational disease while in the service of her special employer. The fact that a workman has a general and a special employer is not inconsistent with the relationship of employer and employee between both of them and himself (Matter of De Noyer v. Cavanaugh, 221 N. Y. 273; Matter of Dennison v. Peckham Road Corp., 295 N. Y. 457). Depending upon the facts of the case, the employee may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Shoemaker v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Matter of Dennison v. Peckham Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Peoples Trust Co. v. O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.