Legal Opinion

VANGJELI v. BANKS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01635Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUZANA VANGJELI, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION : LINWOOD BANKS, al., No. 19-1635 Defendants : MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. OCTOBER 1, 2020 Suzana Vangjeli alleges that security guard, Linwood Banks, and his employer, Triple Canopy, Inc., committed various torts when they detained and used force against her. Mr. Banks and Triple Canopy argue that they are entitled to official immunity and derivative sovereign immunity, and move for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API