Legal Opinion

Fontron v. Kruse

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1918No. 21,137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Kiowa district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The action was on a promissory note for $300 given by the defendant to the plaintiff in part payment of a commission for procuring a real-estate loan. The answer admitted the execution of the note, but alleged that the consideration for which it was given, had wholly failed; that plaintiff had orally agreed with defendant to procure him a loan of $20,000 on his farm in Kiowa county, which was to draw interest at the rate of six percent; that defendant agreed to pay him a commission of $600 for his services; and that he had paid $300 in cash…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VanordstrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Trice v. YoemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hazelton v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Crouch v. MarrsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Artwein v. LinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Radebaugh v. DillonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Garrison v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API