Legal Opinion

Artwein v. Link

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1921No. 22,991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for the failure of the defendants to drill an oil and gas well on certain property. A motion to strike out certain parts of the petition was allowed, and after those parts were stricken out, a demurrer to the petition was sustained. The plaintiffs appeal and complain of each order.

The petition alleged that the plaintiffs owned a large acreage of oil and gas leases in Washington county, Ark., and that they “entered into a contract [in writing] with defendants whereby they-assigned…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. States v. DurkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Brown v. HadleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. TrentmanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Riddle v. LanierTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gramkow v. Farmers Cooperative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gartner v. MissimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Denman v. Aspen Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API