Citizens Bank v. Timmons
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Tifton—-Judge R. Eve. May 5, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.
1. Generally the cashier of a bank, as such, has no authority to compromise or discharge debts due his bank without payment, or by accepting other securities, and authority from the bank must be shown expressly or by necessary implication, or by usage or practice, or mode of doing business of that particular bank, or it must be shown to have been acquiesced in or in some other way ratified by the bank, to be of binding effect. See 3 Ruling Case Law, 449.
2. Declarations of an agent as to the business transacted by him are not admissible against his principal, “unless they were a part of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bing v. Bank of KingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Purcell v. Armour Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Citizens Bank v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Rowland v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Carmichael v. SilversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Jones v. Bank of Powder SpringsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Turner v. Masonic Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.