Legal Opinion

Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2002No. 00-10651PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

Primarily at issue is whether the City of Dallas violated certain establishments’ First Amendment rights when it amended its City Code to effectively require female performers to wear bikini tops, among other things, in order for those establishments to avoid being classified as sexually oriented business (SOBs), subject, inter alia, to zoning restrictions. Plaintiff and Intervenors (Plaintiffs), operators of those establishments, contend: the City is collaterally estopped from litigating the constitutionality of the amendment in the light of a similar…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ricky Moore v. City of Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Speaks v. KruseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Quijano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. G.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of St. Joseph, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Richland Bookmart, Inc. v. Knox County, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API