Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Woodel v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. C86-12-145; CA A42847PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This appeal arises from writ of mandamus. Defendant seeks reversal of a trial court order requiring him to record the testimony of all witnesses appearing before the grand jury in the matter for which plaintiffs were subpoenaed. The dispositive issue is whether the court had the authority to enter the challenged order. We conclude that it did not and reverse.

Plaintiffs were contacted by police during an arson investigation. They exercised their right to counsel. After unsuccessful attempts at negotiation, plaintiffs were subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. They asked defendant, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. RothOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Drew v. SteinbockOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hallford v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. PonzoSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API