Legal Opinion

Hallford v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 1993No. 58-89-04466; CA A69472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Petitioners, mother and her husband, appeal from a judgment that set aside husband’s adoption of mother’s child because respondent, the putative father, did not receive notice of the adoption proceedings. We reverse.

In February, 1987, mother, then 18, became pregnant. In March of that year, she told respondent, who was then 17, that he was child’s father but that she did not want to marry him. Later that month, she ended their relationship and began seeing husband. Shortly thereafter, respondent left the area, but called mother twice during the pregnancy.

Child was born on November 7, 1987.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. F. v. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. C. v. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of B J.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Bird v. Norpac Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API