Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Murchison

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1979No. SC 26167, SC 26173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding against a circuit judge in Multnomah County. It arises from the denial by that judge of motions by two persons charged with murder for an order requiring the recordation of the testimony of "all * * * witnesses who may testify regarding defendant(s)” before a grand jury in its consideration of a possible indictment against them, including all witnesses named in a previous indictment for attempted murder of a victim who had subsequently died.

Defendants, the relators in this proceeding, contend that (1) "fundamental fairness” requires that recordation be allowed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hanson v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. RothOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Drew v. SteinbockOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Automobile Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Drew v. SteinbockOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Woodel v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API