Legal Opinion

Haworth v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, Polk District Court. — Host. W. F. CoNRAd,; Judge. ActioN upon a promissory note. Judgment for the-plaintiff, and the defendant J. B. Hensbaw appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The defendant Henshaw signed the note in suit as surety. His answer alleged that his signature to such instrument was procured by fraud, in which the principal debtor and plaintiff participated; that by means of such fraud he was induced to believe, and did believe, that plaintff was lending money to Crosby, who was to use-the same in the purchase of certain shares of stock in a corporation in which appellant or appellant’s wife was-interested; that in truth Crosby did not intend to purchase said stock with the money so procured, but was already the owner thereof, and that said note, or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warren v. BrittonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Trammell v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Crossley v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Abilene State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Northwestern Trading Co. v. Western Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Putney v. SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API