Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. Oak Street Mortgage, LLC
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 18, 2007No. 07-C-41PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court in this putative class action alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (“FCRA”) is Plaintiff Dean Sheridan’s (“Sheridan”) Rule 7.4 expedited non-dispositive motion to permit discovery. Defendant Oak Street Mortgage, LLC (“Oak Street”) has not appeared in this action. Upon application by Sheridan, the Clerk of Court entered default against Oak Street.
By his motion, Sheridan seeks permission to conduct discovery acknowledging that, under Rule 26(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. WorldQuest Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Notaro v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Dimension Data North America, Inc. v. Netstar-1, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Yokohama Tire Corp. v. Dealers Tire Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- St. Louis Group, Inc. v. Metals & Additives Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Ibarra v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Advanced Dermatology v. Plaza Research CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Batch Labs LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.