Legal Opinion

Waldbillig Woodworking, Inc. v. King Arthur's North, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1982No. 80-3087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a mechanic’s lien action. The trial court found that plaintiff Waldbillig Woodworking, Inc., and intervening plaintiff the Dirsmith Group, Inc., do not have valid mechanic’s liens against the subject property. Wallbillig and Dirsmith appeal from this judgment.

In 1976, King Arthur’s North, Ltd., an Illinois corporation, made plans to open a restaurant in Skokie, Illinois. For this purpose, King Arthur’s leased space in a building owned by Canteen Corporation. In October 1976, King Arthur’s engaged Dirsmith to provide…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Side Sash & Door Co. v. HechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Dunphy v. RiddleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. In Re BickelIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Admiral Builders Corp. v. Robert Hall VillageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Von Tobel v. OstranderIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merchants Environmental Industries, Inc. v. SLT Realty Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. D. M. Foley Co. v. North West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Braun-Skiba, Ltd. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Lyons Federal Trust & Savings Bank v. Moline National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API