Holmes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.-
Plaintiff-appellee sought by this action to have the court' declare his rights to coverage under a policy of automobile insurance issued to him by defendant-appellant. From a judgment that the policy of insurance covered plaintiff’s loss, defendant has appealed.
The only question is whether under the facts the “other insurance” provision of ■the policy issued by defendant provided ■insurance to plaintiff. -The provision in question reads:
“14. Other Insurance. If the insured has other insurance against liability or loss covered by this policy, the company under all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark Motor Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Erwin v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Cameron v. Reserve Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Feltenstein v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967