Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1966No. 7946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOISE, Justice.-

Plaintiff-appellee sought by this action to have the court' declare his rights to coverage under a policy of automobile insurance issued to him by defendant-appellant. From a judgment that the policy of insurance covered plaintiff’s loss, defendant has appealed.

The only question is whether under the facts the “other insurance” provision of ■the policy issued by defendant provided ■insurance to plaintiff. -The provision in question reads:

“14. Other Insurance. If the insured has other insurance against liability or loss covered by this policy, the company under all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark Motor Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Erwin v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cameron v. Reserve Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Feltenstein v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API