Legal Opinion

People v. Kuches

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1898No. Crim. No. 323PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. E. C. Hart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. It is claimed that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Defendant kept a confectionery shop which fronted immediately on one of the principal streets in the city of Sacramento. About twenty feet from the street entrance of the shop, and separated from the saleroom by a glass partition covered by a lace curtain, was a small back room furnished with tables and chairs; there was an open doorway through such partition at the corner of the saleroom into this smaller apartment, and some shelves…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. MarcksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Douthitt v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API