Legal Opinion

State v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 2000No. CR 99-1140PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 S.W.3d 551 (2000)

STATE of Arkansas

v.

Kenneth Andrew SULLIVAN.

No. CR 99-1140.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 18, 2000.

Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellant.

No response.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING

W.H. "DUB" ARNOLD, Chief Justice.

The State has petitioned for rehearing in this case, contending that this court's opinion delivered on February 10, 2000, State v. Sullivan, 340 Ark. 315, 11 S.W.3d 526 (2000), contained a significant error of law. The State argues that this court's analysis of the present case using the concept of "pretext" is contrary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Villamonte-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Arkansas v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Fertig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API