Mortimer v. Marder
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was brought to recover of the .defendants damages for their having caused the personal property of the plaintiff to be seized in attachment in an action in the state of Oregon, brought against the plaintiff’s husband, J. D. Mortimer, by the defendants, and for their having caused the same to be sold under execution, bought in by a third party, and wholly lost to the plaintiff, and thereby converted wrongfully to the use of defendants.
It is alleged that the value of the property thus converted was two thousand dollars, and that the plaintiff spent three months of time and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Shumway v. LeakeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Marsters v. LashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Moore v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- McRaven v. DameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- O'Sullivan v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunderson v. GundersonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Easton v. George Wostenholm & Son, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.