McRaven v. Dameron
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. • The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
Suit against defendant for an accounting of money received by him as an attorney for plaintiffs, and to recover the same. Judgment passed for plaintiffs, from which, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
The plaintiffs alleged, in substance, in their complaint, that the defendant, as their attorney, prosecuted two actions in two of the late district courts in and *58for the city and county of San Francisco for the recovery of a one-fifth interest in certain real estate situated in said city and county. The first was against one John Norton and about 203 others, and the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mortimer v. MarderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- (PC) Campbell v. DickeyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Enid Y. Angleró v. Metro Ponce, Inc., d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Dr. Pila; et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
- James v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- McCullock v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019