Moore v. Jones
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought by the purchaser from the husband to quiet title. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
In thiscase it appears that on the 28th of February, 1858, John Sullivan, being in possession of the lot of land in controversy, sold and conveyed it to Mary R. Jones by a deed which recited a consideration of two thousand seven hundred and twenty-five dollars. The grantee named in the *14deed was at the time the wife of Edward Jones. Under the deed she and her husband entered into possession of the lot, and fenced it and built upon it a dwelling-house, in which the family resided. While in possession application in the name of the wife was made to the commissioners of the funded debt of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- People v. VernonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Gunter v. JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Ingersoll v. TruebodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Blood Relatives of Hill v. Blood Relatives of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- In re Estate of RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Mortimer v. MarderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.