Legal Opinion

State v. Jay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 2015No. D124413T; A154731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to give a curative instruction regarding the prosecutor’s opening remarks that — defendant contends on appeal— drew the jury’s attention to defendant’s invocation of her right to remain silent in violation of her rights under both the Oregon and United States constitutions. Defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion in limine to exclude evidence that the arresting officer asked defendant questions…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ArdizzoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SkotlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. SkotlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API