Minneapolis & St. L. R. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa;. Martin J. Wade, Judge. Action at law by the United States against the Minneapolis & St. Tonis Railroad Company. Judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This was an action by the United States to recover penalties from the railroad company for having permitted certain of its employes to be or remain on duty for a longer period than 16 consecutive hours. Section 2, c. 2939, 34 Stat. 1416. There were 19 counts in the complaint, upon each of' which judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The action was tried to the court, and special findings of fact were made. The only question before us is: Do the facts found support the judgment?
The different employes of the railroad company are divided by the findings of fact…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1912
- United States v. Denver & R. G. R.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Travis v. RayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
- United States v. PitcairnDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1938
- United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.