Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 10, 2005No. 02-4020, 02-4021, 02-4074, 03-2627, 03-2695, 03-2766, 03-4830Published

1ConcurrenceAmbro, Circuit Judge

I join wholeheartedly Judge Garth’s conclusion that the Hague appeal should be allowed notwithstanding its untimely filing. I also agree that each of these appeals must be dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction and that the circumstances do not warrant relief by way of mandamus. I write separately, however, to highlight certain considerations, though not present here, that I believe would have permitted appellate review. Moreover, because the majority opinion by necessity stops at the jurisdictional gate, the District Court lacks our Court’s comment on the fee award issues. I thus write…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API