In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1ConcurrenceAmbro, Circuit Judge
I join wholeheartedly Judge Garth’s conclusion that the Hague appeal should be allowed notwithstanding its untimely filing. I also agree that each of these appeals must be dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction and that the circumstances do not warrant relief by way of mandamus. I write separately, however, to highlight certain considerations, though not present here, that I believe would have permitted appellate review. Moreover, because the majority opinion by necessity stops at the jurisdictional gate, the District Court lacks our Court’s comment on the fee award issues. I thus write…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.