Legal Opinion
May Food Manufacturing v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 1, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-36; Court 06-00329PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiff May Food Manufacturing doing business as Mrs. May’s Naturals (“Mrs. May’s”) and defendant United States (“the Government”) pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. The Government asserts that the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) properly classified the subject merchandise as prepared almonds under subheading 2008.19.40 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). 1 Mrs. May’s asserts that the subject merchandise is an article returned to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Arthur L. Franklin (Doing Business as Health Technologies Network) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Dolliff & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- May Food Manufacturing v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Pleasure-Way Indus., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016