Legal Opinion
Chira v. Planning Board of Tisbury
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 20, 1975PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
These seven bills in equity arose from a series of controversies concerning the proposed subdivision of a 107-acre tract of land in Tisbury. Three of them 1 were brought by the owners of the locus (applicants) under G. L. c. 41, § 81BB (as appearing in St. 1957, c. 199, § 2), for the purpose of challenging the actions taken by the Planning Board of Tisbury (planning board) on October 24 (Superior Court No. 1559), November 7 (No. 1560) and November 28 (No. 1562) of 1973 upon alternative subdivision plans submitted by the applicants for approval. In the remaining four bills, brought pursuant to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Joseph Giacobbe v. First Coolidge Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Castle Estates v. Park & Planning Board of MedfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Roberts-Haverhill v. City Coun. of HaverhillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers of New York, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Nantucket Land Coun. v. Planning Bd., NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- North Landers Corp. v. Planning Board of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.