Legal Opinion

Calesnick v. Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 88-1448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

O’NEILL, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs, appearing pro se, assert that they have been wrongfully deprived by defendant Redevelopment Authority of title to a house and lots located at 130-132 Delancey Street, Philadelphia, and of certain building materials and construction equipment which were located at that address. They also contend that defendant Superior Court of Pennsylvania failed to review adequately and properly the issues presented in an appeal of an earlier state court proceeding involving the same properties to which they and the Authority were parties.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boruski v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Adams v. American Bar AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calesnick (Milton A., Eleanor J.) v. Redevelopment Authority of City of Philadelphia, Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. TAGGART v. NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. WALTHOUR v. HERRONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API