Legal Opinion

Hill v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1923No. 164PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit upon a judgment. The defendant, Warren H. Hill, pleaded a discharge in bankruptcy. Subsequently he died and his executors, the petitioners, took his place. There was a trial before a judge without a jury. The plaintiff introduced proof that the judgment was unsatisfied and rested. The defendants proved the discharge and rested. In rebuttal the plaintiff introduced the schedules, of creditors in bankruptcy of Hill in which schedules the plaintiff’s name did-not appear. The defendants asked for rulings that the burden was upon the 'plaintiff to show that he was not notified of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. In the Matter of Maurice G. CROSSWHITE, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of Terry Crosswhite GINTERCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. In Re Jeannie Niles, Debtor. Rita G. Otto v. Jeannie NilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API