Legal Opinion

Atlantic Life Insurance v. Dey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Viewing the allegations of the complaint with the liberality which the law requires on demurrer, it would seem that the allegation of deficiency in payment with interest from date of foreclosure is sufficient to charge the maturity of the unpaid balance, and, if not otherwise alleged, the foreclosure was tantamount to demand for payment. Worth v. Stewart, 122 N. C., 258, 29 S. E., 579; 21 R. C. L., 119; 1 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading (3d), 338.

It is true, the complaint is little more than a skeleton (Thompson v. Johnson, 202 N. C., 817, 164 S. E., 357) — wholly devoid of redundancy — but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Meyer v. Fenner & BeaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Worth v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Thompson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Thompson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Citizens Bank of Marshall v. GahaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Company, Inc. v. J. A. Murdock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Sossamon v. Oaklawn Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API