Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Fenner & Beane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Conceding that the first class of contracts may be void, because in violation of sections 2144 and 2145 of the Consolidated Statutes, still it would appear that the demurrer was properly overruled, as the second class of contracts does not seem to come within the purview of the statutes above mentioned. It is the established rule that where a general demurrer is filed to a complaint as a whole, if any count of tbe pleading is good and states a cause of action, the demurrer should be overruled. Griffin v. Baker, 192 N. C., 297, 134 S. E., 651.

A complaint must be fatally defective before it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Wood v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Bryant v. Little River Ice Co. of Zebulon, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Scott v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Roberson v. SwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API