Legal Opinion

Sossamon v. Oaklawn Cemetery, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether it is mandatory in an action on a written contract to make the entire writing a part of the complaint. The answer is “No,” especially where the part omitted from tbe complaint, as in tbe instant case, is in tbe possession of the-defendant. R. R. v. Robeson, 27 N. C., 391; Gorman v. Bellamy, 82 N. C., 497; Thompson v. Johnson, 202 N. C., 817, 164 S. E., 357; 21 R. C. L., 493.

An allegation containing tbe substance of tbe agreement, as in tbe present complaint, will suffice as against a demurrer. Ins. Co. v. Dey, 206 N. C., 368, 174 S. E., 89; Deloatch v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horney v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Deloatch v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Thompson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Thompson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Atlantic Life Insurance v. DeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RGK, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Roberts v. . GroganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Talman v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Petty v. . LemonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. RGK, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API