Legal Opinion
Navajo Tribe v. Arizona Department of Administration
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1974No. 11683PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Chief Justice.
The controversy presented by this special action in the nature of mandamus was engendered by an opinion of the Attorney General of Arizona, Department of Law Opinion No. 74-12. Based on that opinion, the Arizona Department of Administration-has refused to accept obligations and make payments that the Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) contracted for with The Navajo Tribe and the City of Phoenix, petitioners, and the City of Tucson, and intervenor herein. The job training and employment projects at issue are financed by federal funds made available to The Navajo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mac Manus v. LoveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Crane v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Pensioners Protective Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Estate of Button v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Shapp v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Opinion of the Justices to the GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. DresslerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.