Ruohs v. Traders Fire Insurance

Complainants, who are original policy-holders in the Traders Fire Insurance Coinpany, preferred this bill against the North British & Mercantile Insurance Company to recover indemnity, first, for fire lóssés claimed to have been sustained; second, for returned premiums on account of canceled policies; and, third, Claims of W J. Colburn & Co. for returned premiums paid to policy*408holders of the Traders Company under written instructions of the North British Company. The theory of the bill is that complainants are the beneficiaries of a contract entered into between the Traders and the North…