Legal Opinion

Dale v. Emerson Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, defendants moved to compel plaintiff to demonstrate on a videotape the manner in which he was using a radial arm saw at the time he was injured. Supreme Court denied the motion without comment. The trial court is vested with broad discretionary powers in supervising disclosure, and absent an abuse of discretion, the court’s control of disclosure should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v United Health Servs., 189 AD2d 1072, 1073). Nevertheless, where, as here, the court failed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. United Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. American Security Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. GemerekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API