Legal Opinion

Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on *914the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff Peter Eiss to demonstrate on videotape the manner in which he was using a jointer-planer at the time he was injured (see, Dale v Emerson Elec. Co., 219 AD2d 815). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Discovery.)

Present— Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Memorandum: In

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dale v. Emerson Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995