Legal Opinion

Carter v. McCaleb

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 12, 1998No. 4:97 CV 139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

In accordance with the Opinion entered this date:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt.# 51, 52) are GRANTED, and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff as to Plaintiffs federal law claims;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt.# 57, 58) are DENIED.

OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and/or dismissal. Plaintiff brings suit,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arce v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  2. Haynes v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  3. Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank PrivatBank v. Igor Valeryevich KolomoiskyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
  4. Moniz v. WeipertDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API