Carter v. McCaleb
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
In accordance with the Opinion entered this date:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt.# 51, 52) are GRANTED, and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff as to Plaintiffs federal law claims;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt.# 57, 58) are DENIED.
OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and/or dismissal. Plaintiff brings suit,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arce v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Haynes v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank PrivatBank v. Igor Valeryevich KolomoiskyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
- Moniz v. WeipertDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021