Legal Opinion

Application of Peter Vincent Susi

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 10, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8392PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-13 in appellant’s application serial No. 389,210, filed August 12, 1964, as a continuation-in-part of application serial No. 362,182, filed April 23, 1964, for polymers stabilized against the deteriorative effects of ultraviolet light and a method for making polymeric compositions so stablized. We affirm.

THE INVENTION

Claims 2-5 are process claims, and claims 6-13 are composition of matter claims. Claim 6, the broadest of the composition claims, serves as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Raymond C. GrabiakCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. In re KerkhovenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  5. In re HerbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API